Wednesday, 20 August 2014
CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMINAR TOPICS: DEMOLITION OF BUILDING
CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMINAR TOPICS: DEMOLITION OF BUILDING: ABSTRACT Demolition of a building means tearing down or falling down of a building with the help of equipments or explos...
Thursday, 14 August 2014
Monday, 16 June 2014
Sunday, 8 June 2014
Sunday, 2 March 2014
Wednesday, 22 January 2014
Tuesday, 21 January 2014
Monday, 20 January 2014
Friday, 3 January 2014
GD Process Flow
GD Process Flow
Process Stage
|
Possible Observations
|
Evaluators
are present in the Group Discussion room.
|
|
Participants
are called in.
|
|
Participants
come into the room.
|
·
Order
and manner in which the participants enter the room.
·
Interactions
among the participants.
|
Evaluators
greet the participants.
|
·
Do the
participants greet back?
|
Evaluators
ask the participants to take their seats.
|
·
Who
chooses which seat?
·
Who
chooses promptly and confidently?
|
Evaluators
take in their first impression of the participants.
|
·
Presentability,
confidence, composure, body language and other qualities that are a part of
the first impression.
|
Evaluators
announce the topic, structure and provide instructions for the Group
Discussion.
|
·
Who asks
clarifications?
·
The quality
of the query asked?
|
Evaluators
announce commencement of GD session.
|
|
Participants
take time to collect their thoughts and prepare for the discussion.
|
·
Are pen
and paper used, points jotted down?
·
Is the
time allotted judiciously used?
|
Evaluator
asks the participants to start the discussion or participants initiate the
discussion themselves.
|
·
Who
takes initiative and begins the discussion?
·
Quality
of opening statements made.
|
Evaluator
observes the discussion
|
|
Topic
|
·
Who
tries to define the topic?
·
Who
tries to check if all participants have an understanding of the topic?
·
Does
anyone try and define the objectives for this discussion?
·
Does
anyone try and define a framework for points to be considered during the
discussion?
|
Points/
Ideas
|
·
The
number of points
·
The
relevance of points
·
The
variety of points, out of the box points, uniqueness of points
|
Communication
|
·
The
conciseness of the spoken statement to convey the idea of the point
·
The
diction, tone, volume, confidence of speech
·
Is the
speech directed to the entire group or to some strategic participants?
·
Who
responds to the spoken point, the entire group or only a select few?
|
Discussion
|
·
Does one
ask for clarifications on or offer supporting data for points made by others?
·
Is one
able to offer clarifications to others on own points?
·
Does
anyone try to moderate the discussion?
·
Can
anyone evaluate and point out the relevance of a point to the discussion,
weed out irrelevant points?
·
Is
anyone able to get all the participants to contribute?
·
Who is able
to summarize the discussion till at any given point in time, evaluate the
direction the discussion is taking?
|
Evaluator
signals end of discussion, thanks the participants and request them to leave
the room.
|
·
How do
the participants react, who is dejected, who is upbeat, who is confident, who
maintains their poise etc.?
·
Does
anyone ask any queries? If so, the relevance of the queries?
·
Does
anyone thank the evaluators?
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)